Legal Opinion
B.E. Technology, LLC v. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 12, 2016No. 2015-1882; 2015-1883; 2015-1884; 2015-1887; 2015-1888UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lourie, Circuit Judge.
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. (“B.E.”) appeals from four final written decisions of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”), across five inter partes reviews (“IPR”), finding all three claims of its U.S. Patent 6,771,290 (“the ’290 patent”) unpatentable. See Google, Inc. v. B.E. Tech., L.L.C., Nos. 2014-00031, IPR2014-00033, 2015 WL 1570822, at *14 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 6, 2015) (“Google Written Decision”); Microsoft Corp. v. B.E. Tech, L.L.C., No. IPR2014-00040, 2015 WL 1570824, at *15 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 6, 2015) (“Microsoft Written Decision”)-,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gentex Corporation v. Galvion Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Genuine Enabling Technology LLC v. Sony Corporation and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Hoyle v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022