Steinfeld v. Zeckendorf
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. Fred Sutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the .opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The history of this case may he found in 10 Ariz. 221, 86 Pac. 7; 11 Ariz. 192, 89 Pac. 496; 12 Ariz. 245, 100 Pac. 784; and 225 U. S. 445, 56 L. Ed. 1156, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 728. It originated in the territorial days in the district court of Pima county, where it was twice tried. Two appeals were prosecuted from judgments of the trial court to the supreme court of the territory. From the last judgment of the latter eourt both parties appealed to the supreme court of the United States. The “statement of the facts of the *337ease in the nature of a special verdict” was made and certified to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Moran v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OldlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.