Legal Opinion
Stanfill v. Penniman Gravel & Material Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1930No. Nos. 1359-5502PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvev, P. J.
The following statement of the ease, as made by the Court of Civil Appeals, is adopted:
*136“This cause arises out of the following undisputed facts:
“Hutton owned real property in Dallas county, and on July 1, 1927, contracted with Tnge & Burgher for the erection of a brick building thereon. August 1, 1927, Inge & Burgher made a subcontract with L. W. Stan-fill, by which the latter agreed to do certain concrete work on the building. Between September 1 and 16,1927, Stanfill purchased from Penniman Gravel & Material Company and from W. B. McAtee & Sons materials in the respective .amounts of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
- Penniman Gravel & Material Co. v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Ralph M. Parsons Co. v. South Coast Supply Co. (In Re a & M Operating Co.)District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- John Plath Green, Trustee of the Estate of Texas Pool Corporation, Bankrupt v. H. E. Butt FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Ideco Division of Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Chance Drilling Company, Inc., Small Business Administration, ImpleadedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Perry v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.