Porter v. General Boiler Casing Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here hold that a trial judge erred in granting a motion for summary judgment in that he failed to note that inferences could be drawn from that which was before him contrary to the position of the party in whose favor summary judgment was entered. Thus, the matter could only be resolved by trial.
Appellant, Richard M. Porter (Porter), was injured on the job while employed by appellee, General Boiler Casing Co., Inc. (General). General has its headquarters in North Carolina. 1 It specializes in “lagging” boilers in power plants. (“Lagging” consists in covering a boiler with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Washington Homes, Inc. v. Interstate Land Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Fenwick Motor Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Tellez v. Canton Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Cochran v. NorkunasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.