Legal Opinion

Ungar v. Wagner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

Petitioner brings this article 78 proceeding against the Board of Estimate. The specific purpose is to direct the respondents to place a petition and communication of the petitioner on the calendar of the board for hearing. Respondents cross-moAred to dismiss the petition.

*404The first question is whether the respondents can be compelled by judicial fiat to do what the petitioner requests. A very important factor in the determination of that question would be the fundamental character of the board, whether legislative or executive. The parties here take the position that the board is an executive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wooster v. . MaherNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Ungar v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perazzo v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Raynes v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API