Hurley v. Heilig
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court upon defendants’ motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ opposition thereto. 1 Defendants Vicki Heilig and Mary Maxfield (hereinafter collectively referred to as “defendants”) request that the court dismiss the instant action because the issues and relief requested in it are encompassed by an active case currently pending in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (hereinafter referred to as “the Superior Court”). In opposing defendants’ request, Plaintiffs John…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Thanh Vong Hoai v. Sun Refining and Marketing Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Manor Investment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Foster-El v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Edge Inv., LLC v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018