Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Kealoha
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided April 19, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-00589 ACK-BMKPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU’S MOTION FOR “PARTIAL” DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT LOUIS KEALOHA’S MOTION FOR “PARTIAL” DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT
ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.
For the following reasons, the Court: (1) GRANTS Defendant City and County of Honolulu’s Motion for “Partial” Dismissal of the Complaint; and (2) GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant *1205Kealoha’s Motion for “Partial” Dismissal of the Complaint. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint, except as to Count II (against all Defendants)…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fisher v. KealohaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- Nichols v. BrownDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Baird v. BontaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- California ex rel. Ingenito v. United States ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Chambers v. Fairbanks Police Dept.District Court, D. Alaska · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.