Legal Opinion
Belleson v. Skilbeck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 1932No. Nos. 28,767, 28,963PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant John R. Skilbeck and from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint by the defendant Central Surety & Insurance Corpora-, tion.
The plaintiff brings the action to recover for personal injuries caused in an automobile collision. The action is against .John R. Skilbeck and Central Surety & Insurance Corporation. As against Skilbeck the complaint alleges that Skilbeck and one L. B. Belleson were copartners, engaged in the grocery business in Minneapolis; that on October 15,1929, the said partnership owned an automobile; that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roller v. RollerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- McKelvey v. McKelveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Taubert v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. KelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Worrell v. WorrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.