Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Clark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 1994No. 93-955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

On May 22, 1989, the appellant, Janie Hicks, filed a complaint alleging the appellee, Ken Clark, was negligent in permitting one of his cows to roam upon a roadway. Hicks alleged she hit the cow with her automobile, and sustained personal and property injuries for which she sought $61,209.51 in damages. The deputy sheriff failed to serve Hicks’s summons and complaint on Clark until March 29, 1990, or more than ten months after the filing of the complaint. Clark filed no answer, and a default judgment was subsequently entered against Clark on July 17, 1991.

On October 8,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Green v. WigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Cole v. First Nat. Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Morgan v. NeuseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Southeast Foods, Inc. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Sublett v. HippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Mark Barner v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Clouse v. Ngau Van TuCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API