Legal Opinion

Bittner v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2001No. 00-3848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Howard Bittner, an Ohio prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Seeking monetary and injunctive relief, Bittner sued Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections Director Reginald Wilkinson; Institutional Inspectors Cheryl Jorgensen-Martinez and Antonio E. Lee; Mansfield Correctional Institution…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Shehee v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Cynthia Bloch and Thomas Bloch v. Sheriff L. John RibarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David Evans v. Heidi Washington, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  2. Johnson v. CardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. McArthur v. CargilDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  4. Williams 324866 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) 1District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Williams 324866 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) 1District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API