Legal Opinion
Neary v. Mastec North America, Inc.
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided May 9, 2016No. SUCV201502655HPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Curran, Dennis J., J.
The defendants MasTec North America, Inc., Jose R. Mas, George L. Pita, and Christopher Tremblay, have filed a motion to compel arbitration, to dismiss, and to stay discovery. They assert that Mr. Francis Neaiy’s claim is subject to final and binding arbitration under a Dispute Resolution Policy executed among the parties and that therefore, his claim may not proceed in this Court.
For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion must be ALLOWED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On April 14, 2014, Mr. Neaiy started working as an installer with MasTec, a Florida corporation. His main…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Miller v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- D.R. Horton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.