Legal Opinion

Brunet v. Deshotels

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1926No. 25452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants, who are father and son, were sued for damages by plaintiff in behalf of her minor daughter. It is alleged that the younger Deshotels, under a promise of marriage, which he violated, seduced the girl. He is also charged with being the father of her illegitimate child. The senior Deshotels is sought to be held under Civ. Code, art. 2318, providing that parents are responsible for the damage caused by their minor children.

Defendants filed an exception of no cause or right of action and a motion to elect. The exception was overruled, and the motion was denied on the same day.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Overhultz v. RowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Carson v. SlatterySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Royal School Dist. No. 160Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Christensen v. Royal School District No. 160Washington Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API