Legal Opinion

Deveso v. Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crouch, J.:

The actions are to recover damages for failure to deliver potatoes. After certain preliminary correspondence, plaintiff Deveso wrote defendant a letter, of which the following is the operative part:

“ I hereby contract for myself (Frank Deveso) Six (6) cars U. S. Grade Number One Potatoes, heavy pack, in Standard *686Stave Barrels, at $5.50 per barrel, F. O. B. cars, shipment June 21st, 1920, one car daily.
“ Also I hereby contract for the Larkin Company four (4) cars U. S. Grade Number One Potatoes heavy pack, in Standard Stave Barrels, at $5.50 per barrel, F. O. B. cars, shipments June…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Hopper v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Whitney v. McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Vail and Adams v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  5. Cassin v. Stillman, Delehanty-Ferris Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huber Baking Company v. Stroehmann Brothers Company and Quality Bakers of America Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. SiracoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Turlock Merchants & Growers, Inc. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API