Legal Opinion
Horoshko v. Citibank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 1, 2004No. Docket No. 03-7388PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-Appellants Valentine Horosh-ko and Roger Horoshko appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sterling Johnson, Jr., Judge) dismissing as frivolous their complaint, which asserted claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, and the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, against Citibank, N.A., Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, and others. The Horoshkos are defendants in a separate foreclosure action brought by Citibank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peter J. Malley v. New York City Board of Education City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Rodriguez Alvarez v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
3Cited by155 opinions
- Gallop v. CheneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Hu v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Williams v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Gail Greenidge and Geary Greenidge v. Allstate Insurance Company, Docktet No. 04-1515 CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Turner v. BoyleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.