Legal Opinion
People v. Ramos
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s claim regarding the denial of his application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]) is preserved for appellate review (see People v Davis, 253 AD2d 634, 635 [1998]; cf. People v Smocum, 99 NY2d 418, 423 [2003]; People v James, 99 NY2d 264, 272 [2002]; cf. People v Lugo, 69 AD3d 654 [2010]; People v Patterson, 40 AD3d 659, 659 [2007]; People v Reeder, 221 AD2d 666, 667 [1995]). Furthermore, once the court ordered the prosecutor to set forth the reasons for his peremptory challenges, it effectively found that a prima facie case of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. SmocumNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. HeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. KhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017