Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Morse

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1900No. 1566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by Vernon Wilson against Henry N. Morse on contracts. Application by defendant for writ of certiorari. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Belknap, J.:

It appears from the return to the writ that this action was brought to recover a judgment upon two contracts made by the above-named parties — one for services rendered by plaintiff to defendant as superintendent of his mine, and the other for board furnished his workmen, amounting in all to the sum of $3,076 25. Thereafter, and during the pendency of this action, an action was commenced by defendant herein, as plaintiff, against plaintiff herein, as defendant, in the superior court of the city of San Francisco, State of California, to determine an adverse claim made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ex Parte DelaNevada Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruddell v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Iveson v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hilton v. Second Judicial District Court ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Fitchett v. HenleyNevada Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API