Legal Opinion

Patmore v. Town Of Chapel Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 2014No. 13-1049PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where defendant enforced a zoning amendment by citing the owners of rental properties rather than their tenants because it was a more effective method of enforcement, their enforcement against property owners was rationally related to the purpose of the zoning restriction and did not violate plaintiffs’ right to substantive due process. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-301 governs a municipality’s authority to regulate parking in public vehicular areas, while the zoning amendment was a land use restriction intended to curb over-occupancy of rental properties by limiting the number of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Town of Beech Mountain v. Genesis Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Blackmon v. Tri-Arc Food Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Blue Ridge Healthcare Hosps. Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. C. Terry Hunt Indus., Inc. v. Klausner Lumber Two, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Point S. Props., LLC v. Cape Fear Pub. Util. Auth.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API