Legal Opinion
Bridgeforth v. Bronson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 3, 2008No. Civil Action 06-2128 (RCL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court has considered the motion filed by defendants David Smith, Joseph Powell, Darrell Johnson, Ralph W. McLean, the District of Columbia, James Carter, and Jose Acosta [23], plaintiffs motion [24, 25], the above mentioned defendants’ reply and opposition [28, 32], co-defendant Khadijah Bronson’s reply and opposition [30], plaintiffs reply and opposition [29, 31], the entire record herein, and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heritage Foundation v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- State v. City of SunnysideWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- Turpin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020