Calkins v. Pierce
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions by defendant. Exceptions sustained. This is a real action to recover possession of a lot of land situate in Caribou, in the County of Aroostook. Defendant plead general issue, and by brief statement disclaimed any right and title to land outside of that formerly known as the “James Calkins Homestead,” and the house on said farm. At the February term, 1914, the case was referred to the Court on an agreed statement of facts, with right of exceptions.
Read the full summary
On exceptions by defendant. Exceptions sustained. This is a real action to recover possession of a lot of land situate in Caribou, in the County of Aroostook. Defendant plead general issue, and by brief statement disclaimed any right and title to land outside of that formerly known as the “James Calkins Homestead,” and the house on said farm. At the February term, 1914, the case was referred to the Court on an agreed statement of facts, with right of exceptions. The Court ordered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant excepted to said order. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHaley, J.
This is a real action brought to recover the possession of a lot of land situated in Caribou, County of Aroostook, and was heard at the February term, 1914, by the Court without a jury on an agreed statement of facts, with the right of exception.
The material facts of the agreed statement are, that the plaintiff was devised for her life by the will of her husband, proved and allowed in the Probate Court on the third Tuesday of December, 1895, the lot of land demanded and described in the writ; that on May 4th, 1909, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into the following agreement:
1…
2Cited by2 opinions
- LaFlamme v. HoffmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980