Legal Opinion

Haire v. Patterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1963No. 36626PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Poyhonen, J. †

— Respondents instituted this action to compel appellant to perform specifically the terms of a certain earnest money agreement for purchase and sale of ranch property. Respondents are the purchasers named and appellant the seller. From a decree of specific performance requiring the appellant to enter into a contract of sale, this appeal follows.

The earnest money receipt and agreement (Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 1) reads in part as follows:

“Harold A. Allen Co.
“Earnest Money Receipt and Agreement
“Tacoma Wash. December 20, 1960
“Received of Jesse L. Haire and Frances Haire, Husband and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Northwest Properties Agency, Inc. v. McGheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  3. Neiffer v. FlamingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Pruitt v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Darneille v. GeraciCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API