Haire v. Patterson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Poyhonen, J. †
— Respondents instituted this action to compel appellant to perform specifically the terms of a certain earnest money agreement for purchase and sale of ranch property. Respondents are the purchasers named and appellant the seller. From a decree of specific performance requiring the appellant to enter into a contract of sale, this appeal follows.
The earnest money receipt and agreement (Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 1) reads in part as follows:
“Harold A. Allen Co.
“Earnest Money Receipt and Agreement
“Tacoma Wash. December 20, 1960
“Received of Jesse L. Haire and Frances Haire, Husband and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Northwest Properties Agency, Inc. v. McGheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Neiffer v. FlamingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Pruitt v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Darneille v. GeraciCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.