Legal Opinion

Moore v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1924No. 432-3863PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The judgment heretofore entered in this case merely denied the relief asked in defendant in error’s petition, in which it sought to set aside the award of the Industrial Accident Board. Plaintiffs in error pleaded fully, not only in reply to defendant in error’s petition, but also pleaded and prayed judgment on behalf of. themselves as heirs of Minnie Sanders.

Plaintiffs in error have filed a motion to correct that judgment, praying that judgment be rendered awarding one-third of the total award of the. Accident Board to Ed L. Moore, one-third of that award to Alice Moore, one-sixth to Coe &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Laas v. SeidelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Frederick L. v. WillisTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Patton v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Fort v. FittsTexas Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. v. ShillingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. DappermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API