Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Duran

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 2009No. 73, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

After exposing his penis to various girls of middle school age on three separate occasions in Prince Georges County, Michael Raheem Duran was indicted on four counts of indecent exposure. 1 Subsequently, Duran pled guilty, under an agreed statement of facts, to one count of indecent exposure in each of the three cases. The plea agreement provided that Duran would be sentenced to time-served as well as five years supervised probation, with the requirement that he be evaluated by Parole and Probation as part of a Pre-Sentence Investigation to determine if he were a sexual…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. TimmendequasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Sweetwine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. State v. RogersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Rollins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API