Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 2019No. 1993/17Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Jimmie Rogers, No. 1993, September Term, 2017. Opinion by Nazarian, J. MARYLAND SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY–REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS When the underlying conviction does not, alone, mandate registration with the Maryland Sex Offender Registry, the State must prove any remaining statutory elements by the preponderance of the evidence. Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-CV-17-000296 REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1993 September Term, 2017 ______________________________________ STATE OF MARYLAND v. JIMMIE ROGERS…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Hines v. FrenchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API