Legal Opinion
State v. Chapman
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 12, 1992No. 910529-CAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
841 P.2d 725 (1992)
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Quetzalcohual CHAPMAN, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 910529-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
November 12, 1992.
Brooke C. Wells, Joan C. Watt (argued), Salt Lake Legal Defender Ass'n, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.
R. Paul Van Dam, State Atty. Gen., J. Kevin Murphy (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellee.
Before GARFF, JACKSON and ORME, JJ.
JACKSON, Judge:
Defendant Chapman filed this interlocutory appeal from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a police stop. We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.