Holst v. Burrus
Supreme Court of Georgia
Money Rule. Practice in Supreme Court. Mortgages. Judgments. Debtor and Creditor. Corporations. ' Before Judge Ingram. City Court of Columbus. October Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
The property of a corporation by the name of the Columbus Driving and Base-Ball Association was sold, under a general judgment against the corporation. The sheriff, having the money in hand, was ruled to pay it over. To that rule parties were made, one of whom was Hoist, who claimed as a mortgagee. Another was a second general judgment creditor. The mortgage bore date in December, 1885, and the judgments were rendered, one of them in April, and the other in July, 1886- The mortgage was foreclosed in July, 1886. The mortgagee filed a regular petition, claiming the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mayor of Brunswick v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Barksdale v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Frierson v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pace v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Randolph v. Brunswick & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Glenn v. BurgessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Martin v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.