Legal Opinion

Jonathan Savidge v. Jaylon Fincannon

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1988No. 86-1841PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents two questions. The first involves the plaintiffs’ eligibility to recover attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for legal work performed on an aspect of their case that became moot before reaching judgment and was arguably barred by res judicata. The second question concerns the scope of qualified official immunity doctrine. After reviewing the tortuous path that brought these parties before us, we conclude that in denying attorney’s fees without a hearing, and in granting immunity to the individual defendants, the district court erred. We therefore…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Morris v. DearborneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. McIntyre v. TraughberCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Philadelphia Police & Fire Ass'n for Handicapped Children, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Patten v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Patten v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API