Legal Opinion
Holly v. Alliance Rubber Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 27, 1974No. Civ. A. C 73-1186 YPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Defendant Alliance Rubber Company has moved this Court, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Upon consideration and for the reasons stated below the motion is denied.
This action was instituted under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 2000e for in junctive relief and damages for alleged employment discrimination. In its Order of'May 13, 1974, the Court: (1) dismissed all plaintiff’s claims under 42 U. S.C. § 2000e (hereinafter Title VII), except insofar as they allege that defendant maintains a discriminatory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Julius G. Getman v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Bristol-Myers Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- James P. Miller v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mary F. Cunningham v. Litton Industries, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patricia BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEAD CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Wright v. St. John's HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Partin v. St. Johnsbury Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
- Williams v. Massachusetts General HospitalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
- Reeves v. American Optical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.