Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Fisher Body Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Sam Rubin presented his claim for compensation against the Fisher Body Corporation for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant and the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, insurer, bring certiorari. Claimant was injured on the* 19th day of June, 1917, while in the employ of the defendant Fisher Body Corporation.

Read the full summary

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Sam Rubin presented his claim for compensation against the Fisher Body Corporation for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant and the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, insurer, bring certiorari. Claimant was injured on the* 19th day of June, 1917, while in the employ of the defendant Fisher Body Corporation. On December 26, 1917, he filed a written claim for compensation for loss of the sight in his right eye. The record shows that claimant reported his accident to his foreman and was…

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

(after stating the facts). Defendants in this court urge that the board was in error in hold*608ing that claimant was not barred from recovery upon the ground that he had mad© no claim for compensation within six months after the date of the injury. We think appellants’ contention sound. We have held that a claim for compensation must be an unequivocal one. Baase v. Banner Coal Co., 202 Mich. 57; Brown v. Weston-Mott Co., 202 Mich. 592, and the following cases are conclusive upon the point that such claim must be made within the period of six months fixed by the statute. Cooke v. Furnace Co., 200…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kalucki v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Brown v. Weston-Mott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Draper v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Schild v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Higgins v. Heine Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. McClenahan v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API