Legal Opinion

State v. CAE

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 10, 2009No. 36739-4-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

201 P.3d 361 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Appellant,

v.

C.A.E.,[†] Respondent.

No. 36739-4-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 10, 2009.

Todd Layton Dowell, Kitsap County Prosecutor's Office, Port Orchard, WA, for Appellant.

David Gene `arthur' Wecker, Attorney at Law, Port Orchard, WA, Brett Andrews Purtzer, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

HOUGHTON, P.J.

¶ 1 The State appeals a trial court's restitution order based on a juvenile adjudication of guilt.[1] The State argues that the trial court improperly excluded the costs of unperformed but anticipated medical…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Cosgaya-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. R.G.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State Of Washington v. J.r.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State Of Washington, V C. N. T.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API