Legal Opinion

Orbeta v. Gomez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 4, 2000No. 2-99-1159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BOWMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Julita Orbeta (Julita), filed suit against defendant, Alita Garcia Perez Gomez (Alita), for alienating the affections of Julita’s husband, Dr. Gregorio Orbeta (Gregorio). At the close of Julita’s case in the bench trial of this matter, the trial court granted Alita’s motion for a directed finding and entered judgment in Alita’s favor. Julita argues that the trial court erred in directing a finding in Alita’s favor and was predisposed to rule for Alita. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court for the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Zankle v. Queen Anne LandscapingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Coulter v. RenshawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Farrier v. FarrierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. Smith v. GillappAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anest v. AudinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Rolando v. PenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Cooke v. Maxum Sports Bar & Grill, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Cooke v. Maxum Sports Bar & Grill, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API