Legal Opinion

Wells v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 20, 1987No. 05-86-00734-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLUNG, Justice.

Appellant was charged with aggravated robbery and tried before a jury. After appellant was convicted, the jury assessed a sixty-year sentence and $10,000 fine. He appeals, in part, on the basis that evidence of an extraneous offense was improperly admitted. We hold that the trial court erred in allowing this evidence to be admitted. Consequently, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new trial.

Although appellant does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence, determination of the admissibility of extraneous offense evidence requires careful analysis of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Boutwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. United States v. Anthony Frank Gaggi, Henry Borelli, Peter Lafroscia, Ronald Ustica, Edward Rendini and Ronald TurekianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. State v. ChampagneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Caro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Codiem Renoir Wooten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API