Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Pickett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1942No. 35086PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P. J.

The parties to this cause are N. T. Stuart, appellant, and the appellees are the Lackey Lumber Company, a partnership, and John Pickett and his wife. The Lumber Company was indebted either to Mrs. Pickett or Stuart in the sum of $138.50. The question for decision is to whom the money belonged. The lumber company filed its bill of interpleader in the chancery court, making all the other parties to this cause defendants. The hearing on bill, cross-bill of Stuart, and answers and proofs, resulted in a decree in favor of Mrs. Pickett. Prom that decision, Stuart prosecutes this appeal. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Herrin v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Gerlach-Barklow Co. v. EllettMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Humphreys v. McKnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Cameron v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mills v. Damson Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Vincent v. J. W. McClintock, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hancock Bank v. LadnerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
  4. Perret v. LoflinMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Griffin v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API