Legal Opinion · Dissent

CLEAN v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1997No. 65262-7Published

1DissentDurham, C.J.

(dissenting) — I disagree with the majority regarding the validity of the declaration of emergency in the Spokane ordinance at issue. Relying on CLEAN v. State, 130 Wn.2d 782, 928 P.2d 1054 (1996), the majority concludes that a bare legislative assertion of an emergency, unless obviously false, forecloses the people’s referendum right. This court has never granted such deference to a Legislature’s conclusory assertion that an emergency exists. Rather, deference is granted only to the declaration of facts that constitute the alleged emergency. It remains a judicial question whether those facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Estate of BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API