Legal Opinion

Samols v. Mayer

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to vacate notice for examination of defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This motion to vacate a notice for the examination of the defendants before trial will be denied. The action is stated in two counts and seeks to-charge the defendants with negligence in supplying the plaintiff with poisonous drugs used in compounding a prescription of his physician instead of the harmless medicaments as directed. Counsel for the defendants relies on the general rule laid down in Shaw v. Samley Realty Co., Inc., 201 App. Div. 433, and in the cases therein cited, that ordinarily the court will not allow a general examination of a defendant in an action for negligence except…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Samley Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Buehler v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lattimer v. Sun-Herald Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Hillick v. Edwards & SonNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Brown v. BedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford, Connecticut v. ShearmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API