Legal Opinion

Rose v. Niccole

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 5, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00158Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BEVERLY ROSE; Case No.: 22cv158-LL-WVG JACK G. ROSE, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, 13 FILE SUR-REPLY [ECF No. 12]; v. 14 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MICHAEL NICCOLE, M.D.; 15 REMAND TO STATE COURT [ECF MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC, No. 7]; 16 Defendants. 17 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF 18 JURISDICTION MOTIONS TO 19 DISMISS [ECF Nos. 3, 5] 20 21 22 Before the Court is Beverly Rose and Jack G. Rose (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand 23 (“Motion”). ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs filed the Motion on March 3,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API