Legal Opinion

United States v. Matteo Romano and Armando Glorioso

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 15, 1983No. 831, 839, Dockets 82-1323, 82-1325PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Chief Judge:

Appellants, Matteo Romano and Armando Glorioso, appeal from judgments of conviction entered against them on September 14,1982, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Both appellants were found guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and were sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

Appellants contend that the District Court erred in denying their motion to dismiss their indictment, and raise several questions on this appeal. They allege that the government violated…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Lilly SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. United States v. Vincent Austain Toner, Colm MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API