Legal Opinion
Olarte v. Crocker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 25, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
881 A.2d 776 (2002)
380 N.J. Super. 203
Jose A. OLARTE and Mary Olarte, Plaintiffs,
v.
Fred CROCKER, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 25, 2002.
Jacqueline Rodriguez for plaintiff (Chet Preston, attorney).
Karen E. Heller, Springfield, for defendant (Mortenson and Pomeroy, Attorneys).
DE LUCCIA, J.S.C.
In this case, the court is required to determine whether a certification authored by a chiropractor is compliant with the requirements of the Automobile and Insurance Cost Reduction Act of 1998, L. 1998, c. 21 (AICRA). This court is persuaded that a chiropractor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Prudential Prop. & Cas. v. NardoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Watts v. CamaliganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Afram v. HellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005