Farmers Bank v. Sinwellan Corporation
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
Two questions are submitted for decision in this appeal from the Superior Court: (1) Is the corporate plaintiff required to comply with 8 Del.C. § 371 before it may maintain the action; and (2) Does the individual plaintiff have a cause of action under 6 Del.C. § 4-402?
I
The facts in which these questions arise are relatively simple and, for present purposes, are undisputed. Plaintiff, Sinwellan Corporation, has a checking account in the Farmers Bank of the State of Delaware, defendant. The gravamen of the complaint is that Farmers wrongfully dishonored certain checks drawn on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. DensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- First National Bank of Springdale v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Model Heating Co. v. MagaritySupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sternberg v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Hudson Farms, Inc. v. McGrellisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Agostino v. Monticello Greenhouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Kesner v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.