Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank v. Sinwellan Corporation

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 13, 1976No. 260PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

Two questions are submitted for decision in this appeal from the Superior Court: (1) Is the corporate plaintiff required to comply with 8 Del.C. § 371 before it may maintain the action; and (2) Does the individual plaintiff have a cause of action under 6 Del.C. § 4-402?

I

The facts in which these questions arise are relatively simple and, for present purposes, are undisputed. Plaintiff, Sinwellan Corporation, has a checking account in the Farmers Bank of the State of Delaware, defendant. The gravamen of the complaint is that Farmers wrongfully dishonored certain checks drawn on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. DensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. First National Bank of Springdale v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Model Heating Co. v. MagaritySupreme Court of Delaware · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sternberg v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Hudson Farms, Inc. v. McGrellisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Agostino v. Monticello Greenhouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Kesner v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API