Miller v. Stuart
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.
This is an action on a negotiable promissory note for $1,000, dated September 12, 1924, executed by defendant Stuart and payable to his own order six months after date. It was indorsed by defendant and delivered to E. J. Welch and C. A. Quigley, who thereafter and before maturity of the note for value, indorsed and delivered it to the plaintiff. The note was also indorsed at the time of transfer by the Pahvant Coal Company and O. W. Ewing. The defendant Stewart pleaded that the execution of the note was obtained by fraud, and that the note was void in law, because it was part of a transaction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Bank of California v. StarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- National Bank of the Republic v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. One (1) Porsche 2-Door, I.D. No. 911211026, Title No. PP10026F Bearing Kansas License Plate No. JOR 1652Utah Supreme Court · 1974
- Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Assets Realization Co. v. CardonUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Bartlett v. DohertyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.