Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 28 of New Madrid County v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided September 3, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFeank, J.
Mandamus to compel respondent, the State Auditor, to register bond No. 1 of a series of refunding bonds issued by Drainage District. No. 28 of New Madrid County, Missouri. Eespondent waived issue and service of the alternative writ, accepted relators’ petition as- and for the writ, and made return thereto in which he admitted the facts, stated in tbe petition for the writ, then alleged why he declined to register the bon'd. Eespondent moved for judgment on the pleadings.
Drainage District No. 28 was duly incorporated as a drainage district by the County Court of New Madrid County on Augfist.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Egyptian Levee Co. v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Morrison v. MoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Hannibal v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Ross v. General American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Tri-County Levee District v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Fabius River Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- McCall v. GoodeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.