Legal Opinion

Pestana v. Pestana

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 4, 2009No. 08-P-1444Published

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

The defendant wife appeals from so much of an amended judgment of divorce nisi as requires her to list the former marital home for sale, in order to permit payment to the plaintiff husband of his share of the equity in the property as part of the division of the marital estate. Because it appears from the record that the trial judge held a mistaken understanding of his legal authority to defer sale of the former marital home, and because of certain other inconsistencies between the amended judgment and the rationale supporting it, we remand the matter for clarification.

Background. The parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Furtado v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Charrier v. CharrierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Slaughter v. McVeyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Tatar v. SchukerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API