Legal Opinion

Tatar v. Schuker

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 14, 1991No. 90-P-536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.

The husband appeals from a judgment of divorce, bringing forward three narrow issues arising out of the judge’s division of property under G. L. c. 208, § 34: (1) Was the judge in error by failing to make a present assignment to the husband of certain liquid assets belonging to the wife? (2) Did the judge abuse his discretion by deferring the husband’s receipt of marital property? (3) Were there discrepancies in the figures used to calculate the division of property?

*535Shortly following a three-day trial, the judge entered his thorough “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.” An equally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Redding v. ReddingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Dewan v. DewanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Hanify v. HanifyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Downing v. DowningMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Tatar v. SchukerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Pestana v. PestanaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API