Legal Opinion
Iacampo v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1999No. Claim No. 86220PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims finding it 70% responsible for injuries sustained by Luca Iacampo (claimant) while he was employed by Santaro Industries, Inc. (Santaro) working on a State highway project in Syracuse. The court further found that claimant and Santaro were each 15% responsible for the injuries. Previously, we affirmed the order that denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim (Iacampo v State of New York, 226 AD2d 1052). On this appeal, defendant contends that the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Ernest v. Red Creek Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Koester v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Kandrach v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Farrell v. LowyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- S.J. KULA, INC. v. CARRIER, KEVINAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Fahey v. Worship House & Outreach Ministries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026