O'Neill v. Warburg, Pincus & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered January 26 and February 6, 2006, granting defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for damages based on lost profits or the “salvageable” value of QoS, and dismissing the complaints, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
“[U]nder common-law rules matters of procedure are governed by the law of the forum” (Martin v Dierck Equip. Co., 43 NY2d 583, 588 [1978]). The question whether plaintiffs had standing to bring this action is a procedural matter (see Mertz v Mertz, 271 NY 466, 473 [1936]). We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Jaffe v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- QOS Networks Ltd. v. Warburg, Pincus & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Cortes v. 3A North Park Ave. Rest Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2014
- Gjuraj v. Uplift Elevator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gjuraj v. Uplift Elevator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hall v. Protoons Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.