Carney v. SARASOTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, the judge of compensation claims held that claimant law enforcement officer was not entitled to the presumption afforded by section 112.18(1), Florida Statutes (2007), because his overnight stay in the hospital for treatment of his heart disease did not satisfy the statute’s disability requirement. Claimant contends this was error. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.
Claimant began his employment as a law enforcement officer with the employer in 1981. In 2007, claimant saw a cardiologist pursuant to a referral by his primary doctor because of problems with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sledge v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Michels v. Orange County Fire/RescueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Bivens v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- City of Port Orange v. SedaccaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- City of Miami v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rocha v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Martz v. Volusia County Fire ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Pasco County Sheriff's Office v. ShafferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Village Center Community Development District v. IlleckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026