Rocha v. City of Tampa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding his hypertension not compensable and denying benefits. We hold the JCC erred as a *140matter of law, reverse the ruling, and remand the case, for the following reasons.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Claimant, in seeking workers’ compensation benefits for his hypertension, relies on the presumption of occupational causation in section 112.18, Florida Statutes (2009). The JCC found, and the Employer/Carrier (E/C) agrees, that Claimant meets most of the statutory prerequisites for the presumption: he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sledge v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Blake v. Merck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Arnold v. Florida's Blood Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Bivens v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- City of Mary Esther v. McArtorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Jacksonville Fire and Rescue etc. v. Johnny BattleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- City of Naples v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Pasco County Sheriff's Office v. ShafferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Pasco County Sheriff's Office v. ShafferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013