Gill v. Prehistoric Ponds, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
We granted Louis Gill’s application for discretionary appeal to determine whether an employee of an alligator farm is a “farm laborer” within the meaning of OCGA § 34-9-2 (a), which provides that the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”) shall not apply to “farm laborers” or their employers. We conclude that an alligator farm is not a “farm” as that term is used in the Act. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the superior court.
In the absence of legal error, the factual findings of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation must be affirmed by the superior court and by the Court of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathis v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Bankhead Enterprises v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Trent Tube v. HurstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Hammock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Pridgen v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norton v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Home Depot v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Cook v. Prehistoric Ponds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Norton v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007