Legal Opinion
Trent Tube v. Hurston
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 5, 2003No. A03A0987PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
In this discretionary appeal, employer Trent Tube and insurer Specialty Risk Services, Inc. (collectively “Trent”) appeal a ruling of the superior court affirming employee Elmon David Hurston’s claim for modification of workers’ compensation benefits. Trent contends that the superior court erred by (1) affirming the finding of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation that Hurston’s claim was not barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitation and (2) failing to remand the case for findings of fact regarding Hurston’s entitlement to benefits in light of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Buchanan v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Holt's Bakery v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Mansfield Enterprises, Inc. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Trax-Fax, Inc. v. HobbaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Hill v. Omni Hotel at CNN CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Renu Thrift Store, Inc. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Donnelley v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.