State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBhitt, J.
Defendant assigns as error the introduction into evidence of certain inculpatory statements made by defendant to Chief of Police Tharrington and Sheriff Dement, contending that the safeguards of defendant’s rights as set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, were not provided.
The evidence disclosed that Sheriff Dement went to defendant’s home on Sunday morning around 9:30 or 10:00 after the altercation on Saturday night. He did not place the defendant under arrest but merely talked with defendant in his home on that occasion. Chief Tharrington went to defendant’s home…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. InmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975