Crescent v. White

OPINION

Appellant commenced this action to set aside, as a fraudulent conveyance under NRS 112.050, a certain deed executed by respondent Gill White to his wife, Dorothy E. White. The *210district court, pursuant to NRCP 41(b), dismissed the complaint against Dorothy E. White. Appellant, contending the district court erred, asks us to reverse.

We do not reach the merits, if any, of the issues raised in the appeal. During oral argument the court, sua sponte, raised the question of appealability of the judgment, because of appellant’s failure to comply with the requirement of NRCP 54(b).1

This court…